🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.